Our church has recently experienced significant contrast in biblical genres. What do I mean by that? Well, within just a few weeks we have finished a series in the letters of Paul to the Thessalonian church, we have been coming to our final weeks in the apocalyptic writing from John in the book of Revelation, and we have commenced the historical narrative in Genesis. Earlier this year our church also preached a series in the poetic songs - The Psalms. With every genre of literature in the bible comes an understanding that the reader will only understand what the author is conveying if we do so within the interpretative grid of the style of his writing. We don't read poetry like we read history. Everyone knows that.
Probably the greatest contrast our church has experienced is what it has meant to walk through the last book of the bible in Sunday School while we have started the first book of the bible in our church service. We should be careful to note that the Scriptures themselves help us to understand what we are reading and how we should read it. For example, In Revelation 1, John begins this book by giving us an interpretive grid. Revelation 1:1 The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his servants the things that must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John.
The original word translated as "made it known," is the Greek word sēmainō. This word means to signify or to sign (symbolize). It is the revelation that comes from Jesus and is about Jesus. It was delivered to John by an angel, and as we read through the book of Revelation, we find that it came through visions and dreams. The cataclysmic language in the book helps us to understand we are not reading a normal historical narrative with a normal chronological sense of history. It is not the genre of history but an apocalyptic letter. The first verse is instrumental in helping us know that the truth comes by way of signals or symbols via a heavenly being from Christ. The truth is seen in understanding what these signals reflect, and the vast usage of Old Testament texts help us to see why the signals are necessary. The temporal events and life of the people of Israel in the Old Testament texts are often alluded to in the symbolism of Revelation. In the apocalyptic style of Revelation, John often universalizes the Old Testament allusions as he helps us to understand God's mission in a sin cursed world as we await the return of Christ on the global stage.
In contrast to this, Genesis has all the hallmarks of a historical narrative but the uniqueness of being the very first book of the bible. History is not always what we want it to be. Some Christians who have bought into the worldly ideals of our day have not been comfortable with the historical perspective of the origins of the universe presented as history in Genesis 1. Sometimes the truth value of a historical narrative has been dismissed by attempts to label it as mythological or tendentious (intending to propose a particular point of view). In contrast to this, the text itself will not let you choose the genre you want it to be.
Genesis 1 has all the hallmarks of what is found in normal Hebrew historical narrative. One (the most prominent) feature is the use of the Hebrew vav (waw) which is translated into our English word, "and" (sometimes now, then, so...). It is a construction in Hebrew that shows a chronological sequence of historical events - one after the other. (And this, then this, and so, and then...)
Historical context in Hebrew narrative most often includes editorial comments and contextual comments to help us understand what it is about. The very first verse of the bible meets this beautifully. In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Often in Hebrew narrative, emphasis also comes through repetition. There is no doubt that the author of Genesis wanted us to know that there is a sequence of days, and each day was good, and within each day God powerfully created everything by his sovereign will. There are many more clues within the text, but it is helpful to know that studies comparing the literary conventions of Genesis 1 with undisputed historical narratives such as 1 and 2 Kings have shown them to be similarity to a statistical figure of 99.5%.
If you wonder why we are being very "literal" when it comes to Genesis and "symbolic" when it comes to Revelation, our answer is simple. It's because God's truth is respected by understanding both the genre in which he speaks and the truth he is conveying from it. He is the author, not us. I can't change his meaning by making the historical, symbolic. I can't change his meaning by making the symbolic, historical. What is most important is that Jesus himself has told us that every book and every genre points to him as the full and final revelation of God to man.
When you approach the bible, approach it knowing that this is God's word. And when you see the different genres of the bible (poetry, history, wisdom, prophecy, apocalyptic, letters, and more), I also hope you see the glorious creativity of God who not only gives us his word but gives it to us in beauty.
The Scriptures reflect our most basic understanding of who God is. He is true, beautiful, and good. Genesis 1 reflects the truth, beauty, and goodness of God in historic narrative. Revelation reflects the truth, beauty and goodness of God in apocalyptic language. In this way, from the very first verse to the very last verse of the bible, the Scriptures show the truth, beauty and goodness of God. And... they show it in the central exaltation of Christ.